Tuesday, September 13, 2016

Moving the Widepoint of a Surfboard Template

To move the widepoint, you adapt the method used for resizing a full-size surfboard template (basic math based).  Follow this link for the full-size template method:

http://bgboard.blogspot.com/2016/01/re-sizing-full-size-surfboard-template.html


Basically, you re-size the template as two different sections.  The front section is from the widepoint forward and the rear section would be from the widepoint to the tail.  It is not complicated but takes a bit of thought to see it.


You re-size the length of the front and rear sections of the template independently/separately.   The original template widepoint is the dividing line between the front and rear sections. You increase and decrease the lengths of each section accordingly to move the widepoint forward or backward.


To move the widepoint back 3 inches, you would lengthen the nose section by 3 inches and shorten the tail section by 3 inches.  To move the widepoint forward 3 inches, you would shorten the nose section by 3 inches and lengthen the tail section by 3 inches.  Use the same math-based method you would use to lengthen and shorten a full-size template (see link above).

I may expand this disussion with some diagrams at a later date... 

Sunday, January 31, 2016

Surfboard Design Blog -- Directory

Surfboard Rail Profile Template Design
Dolphin Wing: Wing-Tail Surfboard Design

Dolphin Wing/Tail Evolution: aka "Stoneburner Tail"
Hotwire Foam Cutter Power Source / Supply & Wire

Polystyrene Foam Types & Specifications: XPS & EPS

Paddle-In Hydrofoil (PIH) Surfboard

Modify Aquarium Air Pump for Vacuum: Whisper AP 150

Resin Warmer: Low Budget
XPS Peel Panel Tests

MountainBoard (MB) & MB-Longboard Hybrids: Custom Assemblies / Builds

Circular Velocity/Acceleration in Ocean Waves & Surfing Physics
http://bgsurfphysics.blogspot.com/2015/05/below-are-some-figuresdiagrams-of.html

Surfable Wave Speed
http://bgsurfphysics.blogspot.com/2016/09/surfable-wave-speed.html

Wave & Surfing Speeds
http://bgsurfphysics.blogspot.com/2018/08/wave-surfing-speeds.html


Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Re-Sizing a Full-Size Surfboard Template



Re-sizing a Full-Size Surfboard Template

It is easy to proportionally re-size a full-size surfboard template and maintain clean curves that are derived from the original template shape.  It can be done by hand and with "simple" math.  You can re-size a template with nothing more than a framing square, a pencil and a batten or a large curve.  It can be done on the floor of a porch, kitchen or garage.  While a calculator is easier, you do not need one to do basic math.

For a directly proportional re-size, the new dimensions must vary precisely.  The aspect ratio must be locked.  Width changes by the same proportion as length.  With aspect ratio locked, a 20" x 72" shape that is re-sized to be directly proportional increases to 21.66" x 78" (light blue ellipses below).  This represents a 0.277" increase of the maximum width for every 1.0" increase in length.  However, length and width can be re-sized independently of one another to create a desired combination of length and width (aspect ratio unlocked).


Somebody might specifically want a 5'10" Takayama Scorpion shape that is 23" or 19.25" wide rather than the original 21.25" width.  The proportional math method discussed below maintains the basic shape while varying one dimension with the other dimension (width or length) remaining fixed.  Curve "steepness/flatness" (slope) of the planshape outline is definitely altered by changing one dimension while the other remains fixed.  But the curve's slope changes are still in the same position relative to the original shape/template.  This method can also be a good way to evaluate the effect that varying one dimension has on surfboard performance, while the other dimensions remain fixed.  But, both length and width dimensions can be altered independently for a template also.

I will use a Lis Fish figure (Kinstle, 1977) to illustrate the method described below.  Dimensions shown in all figures below are those of the original figure and have not been re-labeled to show the increases or decreases discussed.  

To re-size a full-size template, first divide desired length or width by original template length or width, respectively.  In this example, the objective is to increase template/surfboard width from 21" to 23".  Divide 23" by 21".   This gives you 1.095.  The measured widths of the Lis Fish template below (Figure 1) are at 6" intervals.  Now multiply each of these widths by 1.095 and you have the new widths for the same 6" intervals.  To decrease template width from 21" to 19" divide 19" by 21".  This gives you 0.905.  Now multiply the original widths by 0.905 and you have the new narrower widths for each of the original 6" intervals.  For either, plot and connect these new width points with a smooth, continuous curve.  You could use the old template or a flexible strip/batten to draw the curved outline.

Fig 1.  Lis Fish templates: original width (21 inches), wider (23 inches) and narrower  (19 inches).  All three are the same length.




To increase template length from 65" to 74", divide the new length (74”) by the original template length (65"), 74/65 = 1.138.   The original template widths will now be placed at 6.828" intervals (1.138 x 6") instead of the original 6" intervals.  To decrease length to 56", divide the new length by the original length (56/65 = 0.862).  Now place the old template widths at 5.172" intervals (0.862 x 6") instead of the original 6" intervals.  Again, plot the points and connect them with a smooth, continuous curve (Figure 2).  

If you plan to change both width and length for the new template, it is easier to calculate and plot the new length intervals first.

Fig 2.  Lis Fish templates: original length (65-inch), longer (74-inch) and shorter (56-inch).  All three are the same width.


To improve nose and tail shape resolution, you can measure template widths at 1-inch intervals for several inches (Figure 3 at bottom of page) -- starting measurements from the template tips (nose and tail).  Similarly, rather than using 6-inch intervals to measure the original template widths, you could use 2- to 3-inch intervals.  Whatever length interval suits you.  The closer together the width measurements are, the better the shape resolution will be overall.  These new intervals will be increased or reduced to increase or decrease template dimensions using the same method described above.

One good template can be used to generate many different combinations of length and width.  By varying one dimension at a time, it is fairly easy to evaluate the effect that changing one variable has on a shape's performance.

Other methods can be used to re-size surfboard templates.  The discussion above is one approach.  Accept.  Reject.  It does not affect me.

["If" you want to maintain the same rocker curve -- curve slope (steepness/flatness); tangent angles relative to given points -- you have to multiply the rocker heights by the same proportion that the length changes.  Otherwise, the rocker curve slope becomes steeper or flatter; bottom angle relative to the water surface changes and is different.  But, maintaining the same rocker curve slope may not be well suited for the new length.]

Moving the widepoint of a surfboard template would use a variant of this method.  Discussed at the following link:

http://bgboard.blogspot.com/2016/09/moving-widepoint-of-surfboard-template.html

Surfboard Design Blog Directory

Figure 3.  Steve Lis Fish
Kinstle, J.F.  1977.  Surfboard Design and Construction, p. 61.  Published by Natural High Express Publishing, Long Beach, CA.



















Thursday, November 12, 2015

Ellipse-Based Surfboard Rocker

Ellipse-Based Bottom Rocker:







The following examples are used to explain a method for creating ellipse based surfboard rockers.  These rocker examples are for illustration of the method.  Actual ellipse heights and lengths must be adjusted to create rockers that are suitable for specific surfboard designs.

The blue ellipse-based rocker shown above was done with 2 ellipses of different sizes joined at the (vertical) midline when completed.  Both Ellipses have the same width (same as board planshape).  Pick the desired nose and tail rocker heights.  Draw a straight line the length of the board -- I used a rectangle instead of a straight line.   Mark where the surfboard wide point would be on that straight line.  Align the (vertical) midline of each ellipse with the widepoint mark on the straight line.  Now place marks (or boxes) of the desired nose and tail rocker heights at the appropriate ends of the straight line.  Stretch the length of each ellipse, independently of one another until each elliptical curve touches the corner of both the nose and tail boxes.  Join each of the half-ellipses at their midlines and trim the ends of the ellipses off at the points where their curves are touching the box corners at each end of the straight line.  This creates an ellipse-based surfboard bottom rocker.


Hope this makes sense.  Turned out wordier than expected.  Very simple when viewed and created as a graphic (below).  Purple is the nose rocker ellipse and red is the tail rocker ellipse.  Green boxes are 2.0" high (tail rocker) and 4.7" high (nose rocker).  Line widths were increased from 1.0 pt to 1.5 pt for blog posting.


Combining Ellipses with Different Heights

I chose ellipses with heights equal to board width in the example above.  Varying ellipse height changes the shape of either nose or tail rocker curve.  Increasing ellipse height will make the curves rounder.  Decreasing ellipse height will make the curves flatter.  That is, as ellipse height gets closer to its length, the curves become more circular.  As ellipse height approaches zero, the curves become flatter.  While the ellipse curve becomes flatter overall, with decreasing height, the curves near the tips become steeper.  Also, with ellipse height fixed, the curve becomes more circular as the length shortens and flatter as length increases.

The figures below all have the same tail ellipse (height = board width).  Board length is still 7'6" (blue rectangle).  Two of the nose ellipse heights are either greater (top figure) or less (bottom figure) than board width.  Ellipse lengths must be stretched or compressed accordingly.  (Ellipse heights cannot be less than 2x nose or tail rocker height.) 




I have been working on ellipse-based surfboard design techniques for several years.  I came up with a planshape method that satisfied me this year.  I recently began using ellipses to design bottom rocker curve and rail profile.  I recently refined my ellipse-based rail profile design technique. Rather than post all of these elliptic concepts here, I decided to start new blog posts at these links:

Links to the other elliptic surfboard design posts:

Ellipse-based rails
http://ellipticsurfboard.blogspot.com/2015/11/ellipse-based-rail-profile.html
Ellipse-based planshape
http://ellipticsurfboard.blogspot.com/2015/11/ellipse-based-surfboard-planshape.html
Ellipse-based fin
http://ellipticsurfboard.blogspot.com/2016/03/ellipse-based-surfboard-fin.html
Ellipse-based tail template
http://ellipticsurfboard.blogspot.com/2015/11/ellipse-based-tail-templates.html


Sunday, March 15, 2015

Dolphin Wing/Tail Evolution: aka "Stoneburner Tail"

After some consideration, I decided the curved tail/wing would be more aesthetically consistent or continuous with total surfboard shape as a whole.  Below are several figures (A-F) that evolved from the original, curved diagram "Stoneburner Tail (lol)".  (The Stoneburner Tail does have a nice ring to it -- enough.)  I rejected several shapes, including C-F.  (Since that time I have played with more ratios and geometry -- new template array at bottom of page.)

For information about the original design (curved and angular variants) and the reasoning behind its development, click the following link:

http://bgboard.blogspot.com/2013/08/angular-dolphin-tail-or-wingtail.html

I felt the apex depth of the internal tail curve could range from 25-50% of the base template tail width.  My gestalt was 40% of the base tail width is the appropriate curve depth.  These shapes are the product of geometry, simple algebra and the artistic perceptions of the minds eye.  If tail width is 13.23 inches.  Forty (40) percent of that width would be 5.29 inches.

Base Plate Template. Tail section used for tail shape designs below.  




A. This curved shape was taken directly from the original concept diagram (the red line curve).

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQ7pFPADF63DT5z65TZfkCr_kIQJD06c2omRJoG1tEZffnAjeiBSUxqdO6GP62NFz3YMElUQ1hIqtn1U3CKSHNT_D3_VU_y3ecg2NbFRTMi9uRbEvueiEqb9CKZ_beS_UVMxiX8GEikYRu/s1600/AKA_Stoneburner_6.jpg


B.  This shape was derived from shape A.
C-F.  Design variations of the original curve diagram.

C.

D.
E.
F.
Updated Tail Template Array

I put together a tail template array (below) to compare a series of designs that use more specific ratios and dimensions than those above.  Internal curve apex or depth is still the same percent of base-template tail width.  The tail shapes in the array below are ellipse-based (click the following link).

http://ellipticsurfboard.blogspot.com/2015/11/ellipse-based-tail-templates.html







Saturday, March 8, 2014

Surfboard Rail Profile Template Design

March 8, 2014


[Update: November 2015 -- I recently developed an ellipse-based rail profile design method. View at the following link:
http://ellipticsurfboard.blogspot.com/2015/11/ellipse-based-rail-profile.html ]




After seeing the recent resurrection of rocker profile measurement discussions at Swaylocks and the insistence about the correct methodology for precision, I decided to post something beyond my original comments in this thread:

http://www.swaylocks.com/forums/railsrailsrailsrails

It seems that rail design and communicating it are the purview of a mystical realm.  Shape is determined when the rail is grabbed by the "hand" of a shaman.

A surfboard rail profile is no less a "foil" than the leading edge of a wing.

Traditional "surfboard foil" is the change in thickness from nose to tail:








What I refer to as rail profile/foil is the shape of the rail's curve as seen from a width-wise cross section of the surfboard -- depicted below using a NACA wing profile image:




Consistent rail design and replication require nothing more than templates, or a good tool (a contour gauge) for measuring an existing rail profile like this one presented by John Mellor at the following link:

http://www.swaylocks.com/sites/default/files/rail_gauge.jpg



All that is needed for rail profile template design and replication is basic geometry -- a circle and a rectangle -- combined with a drawing curve (french curves or ships curves).   See the diagrams at the bottom of the page.

The circle circumference defines the edge of the rail.  Circle diameter and the location of its center relative to the height of the rectangle create pinched, boxy, up, down, 50/50, 60/40, 70/30, hard or soft rails.  Circle diameter and the location of its center also affect tuck.

Length of the rectangle defines the point of blending with the deck.  Height of the rectangle defines the thickness of the board/blank at any given point.

The circle is placed tangential to the outer wall (height) of the rectangle.  The center is moved up and down the height.  A drawing curve is used to draw two curves that are tangential to the circle and blended with top and bottom (lengths) of the rectangle.

Once created, a single rail profile diagram can be proportionally re-sized for any given board thickness.

The same "tangent angles" (to the rail curve) could be used to define rail bands for any profile -- more geometry.

The geometry is simple. It can easily be done by hand.  But I am sure it would be simple for some CAD jockey to create a program that does this effortlessly.

IMO the realm of surfboard rail profile design is wide open and unexplored.

Simple graphics for illustration are below:

Accept.  Reject.  It does not affect me.

Surfboard Design Blog Directory
http://bgboard.blogspot.com/2016/01/surfboard-design-blog-directory.html













Saturday, December 14, 2013

Polystyrene Foam Types and Specifications: XPS & EPS

Below are some foam specifications for XPS available in the U.S.

psi = pounds per square inch (compressive strength)
pcf = pounds per cubic foot (density)

Dow "Blue Foam" (XPS):

STYROFOAM™ High Load 100 -- 100 psi min. compressive strength (density, 3.0 pcf)
STYROFOAM™ High Load 60 = 60 psi min. compressive strength (density, 2.2 pcf)
STYROFOAM™ High Load 40 -- 40 psi min. compressive strength (density, 1.8 pcf)
STYROFOAM™ Brand Square Edge Insulation -- 25 psi (density, 1.6 pcf)
STYROFOAM™ Brand Square Edge Insulation (U.S. Only)
STYROFOAM™ Brand Residential Sheathing (RS) -- 15 psi (1.3 pcf)
Dow Blue Foam Densities (Dow Building & Construction Answer Center)

Owens-Corning "Pink Foam" (XPS also):

Foamular 1000 -- 100 psi, 3.0 pcf density
Foamular 600 -- 60 psi, 2.2 pcf density
Foamular 400 -- 40 psi, 1.8 pcf density
Foamular 250 -- 25 psi, 1.55 pcf density
Foamular 150 -- 15 psi,  1.3 pcf

XPS & EPS Foams

Dow Blue Foam ("Styrofoam") and Owens-Corning Pink Foam (Foamular) are extruded polystyrene (XPS).  XPS is a closed-cell polystyrene foam that is not porous (made light by injecting a blowing agent during polystyrene extrusion, that causes small bubbles to form in the polystyrene as it comes out of the extrusion die) and therefore does not absorb water.  Resin does not adhere well because the foam is not porous (less surface area for bonding because there are no connecting passages, open spaces, between cells) and some gas is released from the cells when they are ruptured.  Some surfboard builders claim good success glassing XPS after the shaped core (final) is scored/roughed with 20-50 grit sandpaper.

EPS foam is expanded polystyrene.  EPS is made by heat fusing polystyrene beads. There are air spaces between beads, which means it will soak up water, but epoxy resin bonds well to it in the 2.0-2.5 pcf densities.  It can be found in 1.0-3.0 pcf densities.  The 2.0-2.5 pcf densities are often used for surfboard cores  -- vacuum veneer sandwich technologies have been used for EPS densities less than 2.0 pcf.


Foam Skateboard Press Requirements

Based on numerous posts/threads at silverfishlongboarding.com as well as information at roarockit.com, you want a foam with a minimum compressive strength no less than 15 psi for skateboard presses/molds.  This is because atmospheric pressure is 14.7 psi (for vacuum pressing).
_____

What is EPS Foam?


The information below can be found at the following link.  It is a good brief discussion about EPS  and XPS foams:


E.P.S. stands for Expanded Poly Styrene and is a lightweight product that is produced by expansion of small solid plastic particles of polystyrene.  The plastic polystyrene expansion is achieved by the virtue of small amounts of pentane gas dissolved into the polystyrene base material during its production.  Butane gas or propane gas can also be used as a blowing agent, however the Pentax gas is most environmentally friendly.
The gas that has been introduced expands under the action of heat that is applied in the form of steam which then forms the polystyrene particles into perfectly closed cells of EPS.  The beads are sorted by weight and size and allowed to age for a given period before proceeding on to the next stage of production.  The EPS closed cell beads are then molded into various forms suited to their application.  This process has now transformed the beads which now occupy approxmately 40 times the volume of the original polystyrene granule.

The manufacturing of EPS foam process takes several steps in order to produce the materials and products we have all come to know. 
The polystyrene particle granules are pre-expanded by free exposure to steam which produces closed cell non-interconnecting beads.

After the pre-expansion, the beads still contain small quantities of both condensed steam and pentane gas and are allowed to cool in large silos where the air gradually diffuses into the pores, replacing in part the two expansion components of steam and pentane gas
.
The beads are allowed to age and go through this diffusing process after which the beads are moulded to form blocks or customized formed products.  The mould serves to shape and retain the beads in a pre-form shape and then steam is once again applied to promote additional expansion.   During this application of the steam and pressure causes the fusion of each bead to its neighboring beads, resulting in a homogenous end product.

Once the product is allowed to cool for a short time, the product is removed from the mould for further conditioning or cut into various shaped by use of hot wire devices or other appropriate techniques.

Regrind

Some foam manufacturers will use recycled or ground up foam material mixed with their virgin foam which is a great way to recycle the material.  While environmentally a very sound process to produce some products, the end product will not have the same structural integrity.

Porosity of EPS Foam

EPS foam by its nature is mostly air, and depending on the density of the foam, there will be more or less air between the fused closed cell beads of EPS.  The higher the density, the more beads and consequently the less space for air between the beads.  

There is some confusion between water absorption with EPS foam and fusion of the beads.  Because of the porosity of the foam, the water absorption is a product of how much air or space there is between the closed cell beads of EPS.  It is therefore possible to have foam that has low water absorption and poor fusion, which makes for a poor quality product for use as a surfboard or paddleboard product.

By using a higher pentane EPS foam, the beads are allowed to expand and improve fusion while reducing the porosity of the foam, hence less water absorption. 

XPS Foam

XPS stands for Extruded Poly Styrene, and is made from a completely different process than the EPS foam.  The XPS foam product starts as a solid polystyrene resin granule, which is then fed into an extruder or die where the granules are melted and then have critical additives mixed with this now viscous fluid.  This fluid then has a blowing agent injected to make the material foamable.  Under carefully controlled conditions where both heat and pressure are used, this foamable material is then forced through a fixture or die at which time the foaming takes place.  The rigid foam is then trimmed into the final dimensions or blocks.  This process produces a completely different cell structure to the foam from EPS. 

This process provides a material called "Styrofoam", which is a Dow Chemical trademarked name.  Mistakenly, most people assume the EPS that is used for coolers and coffee cups is "Styrofoam", but it should be correctly referred to as EPS or beaded EPS foam.  Dow has been making the blue "Styrofoam" for well over 50 years, and the material has extensive use in the building trade.

While the material can be used in the production of surfboards, there are some inherent challenges.  One problem is that the material is made primarily in 8 ft sheets and only 6 to 8 inches thick.  This limits the size of the surfboard that is to be designed.  Another problem that can cause issues is the outgassing of the foam over time.  This can also cause delaminating of the fiberglass laminate.  While some techniques have been developed to minimize this problem, it still remains a challenge.  There have been some improvements to the manufacturing process, and the outgassing problem may be minimized and manageable.


Hotwire Foam Cutters

Information about DIY hotwire foam cutters can be found at this link:


http://bgboard.blogspot.com/2011/01/i-spent-over-8-weeks-trying-to-find-all.html

XPS Bonding/Sealer Coat?
To read about these tests click the following link:

http://shedtech.blogspot.com/2014/12/xps-peel-panel-tests.html